Kesinleşmiş itirazın iptali kararı varken 'önce rehne başvurulmalı' şikayeti reddedilir

Uygulamaya etkisi

Rehinli alacak için genel haciz yoluyla yapılan takipte itirazın iptali kararı kesinleştikten sonra borçlu, önce rehne başvurulması gerektiği gerekçesiyle takibi iptal ettiremez; icra mahkemesi kesin hükmü resen gözetir. Alacaklı, kesinleşen itirazın iptali kararını şikayet dosyasına sunmalıdır.

In English

A creditor started an ordinary (non-judgment) enforcement for a debt secured by a pledge. The debtor company objected, and the creditor won an action to set aside the objection; that judgment became final. The debtor then complained to the enforcement court that the creditor should first have enforced the pledge, and the lower courts accepted the complaint and cancelled the enforcement. The Court of Cassation reversed: by the date of the enforcement court's decision there was a final judgment of a general court setting aside the objection, which has the force of res judicata, and this public-order matter had to be taken into account by the court of its own motion, so the complaint should have been dismissed. Practical point: once a creditor obtains a final judgment in an action to set aside an objection, the debtor can no longer use the 'pledge first' rule to undo the enforcement.

Monthly English summaries: Turkish Enforcement Law Update