Hacizler sonradan harçsız kaldırılsa da harç alacaklısı idarenin şikayeti konusuz kalmaz

Uygulamaya etkisi

İhtiyati hacizden ve takipten feragat edilmesi, ödeme emri tebliğ edildikten sonraysa harç uyuşmazlığına yol açabilir; icra müdürlüğünün hacizleri harçsız kaldırması uyuşmazlığı kendiliğinden sona erdirmez. Feragat zamanlaması ve harç yükü, alacaklı ve borçlu tarafından önceden değerlendirilmelidir.

In English

In a bill-of-exchange enforcement, the creditor waived its precautionary attachments and later withdrew the enforcement itself. The enforcement office then said the attachments would be lifted only if a collection fee (2.27%) was paid, because the payment order had already been served. The debtors challenged this, the first-instance court rejected the complaint, and the regional court held it moot because the office had in the meantime lifted the attachments without a fee. The Court of Cassation reversed on appeal by the tax administration (the fee creditor, a third party): lifting the attachments without a fee does not make the dispute moot for the administration, so the fee question must be decided on its merits. Practical point: waiving attachments or withdrawing after service of the payment order can trigger a fee dispute that the State may pursue on its own.

Monthly English summaries: Turkish Enforcement Law Update